From: Gajewski Mariusz (Mariusz.Gajewski@telekomunikacja.pl)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2005 - 13:56:50 GMT-3
12.2T is that version tested on the lab according to blueprint
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ed
Lui
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:46 PM
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
Hi,
Am I really stuck. I have about 10 2500 routers with 16/16 running
c2500-jk8os-l.122-1b.bin. Should I look for 12.2T? Anyone has 12.2T? Will
12.2T supports all the features we need for the lab?
:(
-- Edward (A+, Net+, MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, CCNA, CCNP)On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:27:56 -0600, Church, Chuck <cchurch@netcogov.com> wrote: > Feature Navigator (www.cisco.com/go/fn) is the tool to use to solve > these questions. Basic IPv6 is supported on the 2500s, but if you try > to add OSPFv3, you'll see the 2500 support go away. It needs more > memory. > > Chuck Church > Lead Design Engineer > CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE > Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation > 1210 N. Parker Rd. > Greenville, SC 29609 > Home office: 864-335-9473 > Cell: 703-819-3495 > cchurch@netcogov.com > PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D > > > -----Original Message----- > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf > Of Amit Jain > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:37 AM > To: Thorne, Gene > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: Re: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > Gene > > I used Cisco CCO login to find on Software Advisor that 2500 series IP > Plus images do support IPV6 and some services. Not sure how much is > sufficient for CCIE or whether they will have full command set or not. > But definitely > they support and need 16/16 RAM and Flash > > Amit > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 Gene > Thorne wrote : > >I searched the archives, but I could not find the previous > email from Bruce about v6 images for the 2500. If such images do > exist, which ones are they? I was under the impression that there were > no v6 images for the > 2500, but maybe I missed the reference. > >-gt > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of > >Ralph > >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM > >To: abcaslow@netmasterclass.net > >Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com > >Subject: Re: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > > >Thanks for the info. Andy!! Now I can get the dust off some of my old > 2500s, > and put them to some good use. > > > >And actually, Andy, I'm one of those > numerous friends of yours that you have not actually met. Your book > has been very useful in my CCIE prep. > > > >Thanks again > >Ralph > > > >-----Original > Message----- > > From: "Andrew B. Caslow" <abcaslow@netmasterclass.net> > >To: > "'Ralph'" <Mandela@myrealbox.com> > >Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:27:48 -0500 > >Subject: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > >Whoop, Sorry Ralph! I thought you > were a friend of mine. I apologize for > >responding to your e-mail as if your > name was "Raj". > > > >I think you will find the contents of my previous e-maul > useful. As I > >mentioned, there are images for the 2500 platform that run v6. > Good luck in > >your studies. > > > >I hope all is well. > > > >-Bruce Caslow CCIE #3139 > > NetMasterClass, LLC > > > >-----Original Message----- > > From: > nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > >Ralph > >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:54 AM > >To: netsteps@rediffmail.com > >Cc: > ccielab@groupstudy.com > >Subject: Re: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > >You > definitely a few 2600's. I do not think the 2500's can run the IPv6 > >code, and > some of the new features in 12.2T. > > > >R. > > > >-----Original Message----- > > From: > netsteps@rediffmail.com > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > >Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 > 01:10:27 -0500 > >Subject: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > >Hey all > > > >I am about > to purchase my home lab for scheduled CCIE Lab. Please advise me > >the > drawbacks of using all 2500's in my home rack instead of 2600's. > >One > difference I noted is that the 2500's can run IP plus as highes > feature > >set. > They dont come with Enterprise Plus, while 2600 can be configured with > >both > feature sets. Is their something extra that wont be there in IP plus > >for 2500 > that i may require for CCIE. > > > >Amit > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ > >__ > >Subscription information may be found at: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ > >__ > >Subscription information may be found at: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ > >__ > >Subscription information may be found at: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ > >__ > >Subscription information may be found at: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:26 GMT-3