From: Joe Smith (j333smith@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 16:40:20 GMT-3
This is a good link:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/19.html
"If you use the traffic-share min command and the variance command, even
though traffic is sent over the minimum-cost path only, all feasible routes
get installed into the routing table, which decreases convergence times."
>From: "Idris, Hashiru Aminu" <hashng@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: "Idris, Hashiru Aminu" <hashng@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: eigrp variance and traffic-share
>Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:19:36 -0800 (PST)
>
>i just couldn't get the real difference between the two commands with
>regards to EIGRP below
>Variance X
>traffic-share .......
>can one be used instead of the other? do they work Collaboratively?
>because they all seem to be for load ballacing.
>please can someone shade some light on this in an illustrative manner
>TIA
>Hashiru Idris
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:24 GMT-3