From: Adebola Adegbonmire [ MTN - UBA ] (AdebolaA@mtnnigeria.net)
Date: Wed Jan 19 2005 - 05:21:44 GMT-3
Hi All,
I was working on this lab. I quite agree with the solution to the question,
but I have a question. The scenario described in task 7.6 is a common issue
with PIM-SM over NBMA (frame-relay) multipoint interfaces. When reading task
7.1 - 7.3 and configuring solution, seeing that PIM-SM needed to be set up
over frame-relay multipoint interfaces I had gone ahead to put ip pim
nbma-mode on all such interfaces. Then I get to task 7.6-7.7.
My question is in the real lab if I have a scenario such as this but without
the explicit wording of task 7.6 -7.7 describing issues that arises over
such interfaces, I would have done the same, knowing the fact that the right
way is this. Would this be wrong? Would I lose points if I do not put in the
ip pim nbma-mode command since the issue is not explicitly mentioned in the
task or would this be a proctor candidate question in your opinion?
Regards,
Bola
NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the MTN Nigeria disclaimer see
http://www.mtnonline.com/contact/disclaimer.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:24 GMT-3