From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2005 - 20:56:32 GMT-3
and I didnt mean to attack, I'm a little bit skewed on QOS myself but I
learn by watching and listening to you guys..........
jl
Joshua Lauer
RHCE, MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, CCIP, CCSP,INFOSEC, CEH
----- Original Message -----
From: "marvin greenlee" <marvin@ccbootcamp.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: IEWB lab 15 - QoS [bcc][faked-from]
> Perhaps that statement came out a bit harsh.
>
> If a question is asking you to convert a custom queue to CBWFQ, it is
> really
> asking a few things:
> 1. Do you understand how custom queueing works?
> 2. Do you understand how CBWFQ works?
> 3. Do you understand how to configure CBWFQ?
>
> If you don't understand custom queueing, or the default values, you will
> have a difficult time trying to accurately convert to CBWFQ. You can't
> just
> ignore values and expect the calculations to come out properly.
>
> Marvin Greenlee, CCIE#12237, CCSI# 30483
> Network Learning Inc
> marvin@ccbootcamp.com
> www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: joshua lauer [mailto:jslauer@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:33 PM
> To: marvin greenlee; ccie2be; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IEWB lab 15 - QoS [bcc][faked-from]
>
> "In my opinion, anyone that doesn't know the default byte count for custom
> queueing should not be attempting the lab."
>
> maybe that's why he's doing practice labs and asking questions..........To
> learn?
>
>
> jl
>
> Joshua Lauer
>
> RHCE, MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, CCIP, CCSP,INFOSEC, CEH
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "marvin greenlee" <marvin@ccbootcamp.com>
> To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:31 PM
> Subject: RE: IEWB lab 15 - QoS [bcc][faked-from]
>
>
>> Your policy appears to be missing the FTP data, unless you also
>> configured
>
>> a
>> port map for that. 'ip nbar port-map ftp tcp 20 21'
>>
>> In my opinion, anyone that doesn't know the default byte count for custom
>> queueing should not be attempting the lab.
>>
>> The queue sizes need to be included to accurately reflect the traffic
>> ratios. Are you saying that if the FTP and the telnet queues had the
>> standard 1500 bytes, that you would just assign 'bandwidth remaining
>> percent
>> 100' to the www queue?
>>
>> Depending on how picky the person grading the section was, they may also
>> want to see "queue-limit 20" for the other classes.
>>
>> - Marvin Greenlee, CCIE#12237, CCSI# 30483
>> Network Learning Inc
>> marvin@ccbootcamp.com
>> www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> ccie2be
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 2:58 PM
>> To: Group Study
>> Subject: IEWB lab 15 - QoS [bcc][faked-from]
>> Importance: Low
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Problem:
>> Convert the legacy custom queue config to MQC.
>>
>> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 tcp www
>> queue-list 1 protocol ip 2 tcp ftp
>> queue-list 1 protocol ip 2 tcp ftp-data
>> queue-list 1 protocol ip 3 tcp telnet
>> queue-list 1 default 4
>> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 5000 limit 30
>> queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 3000
>> queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 500
>>
>>
>> My Solution was:
>>
>> class-map match-all TELNET
>> match protocol telnet
>> class-map match-all FTP
>> match protocol ftp
>> class-map match-all WWW
>> match protocol http
>> !
>> policy-map MQC
>> class WWW
>> bandwidth remaining percent 58
>> queue-limit 30
>> class FTP
>> bandwidth remaining percent 35
>> class TELNET
>> bandwidth remaining percent 6
>>
>> Question:
>>
>> Is my solution which is different from that shown in the IE SG equally
>> correct?
>>
>> I think my solution is better and simpler, assuming it's correct, because
>> it
>> doesn't require
>>
>> you to know that, by default, custom queueing reserves 1500 Bps for the
>> default queue and it doesn't require
>>
>> you to change the max-reserved-bandwidth on the output interface.
>>
>> What do you guys think?
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:22 GMT-3