From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2005 - 19:40:10 GMT-3
This sounds to me like wording that is meant to trip you up. If there
was a question that said "deny Microsoft OSPF from coming in E0/0" how
would you approach this? ;)
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> marc van hoof
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:06 PM
> To: Joseph D. Phillips
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Fw: Microsoft Loopback.
>
> 100% it is - the 169.254.x.x range is something else entirely.
>
> if you get this question on the exam, it IS referring to 127.0.0.1.
>
> ;)
>
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Joseph D. Phillips wrote:
>
> > No, it's not.
> >
> > If you got that question on the exam, Cisco was probably referring
to
> > 169.254.0.0/16
> >
> > Kind of dirty pool because Microsoft itself does not refer to this
> address
> > range as such. To Microsoft, it's its "autonet" address range, used
for
> > autoconfiguration of network interface adapters.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Ventre" <messageboard@ventrefamily.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:27
> > Subject: Re: Microsoft Loopback.
> >
> >
> >>> Is it 127.0.0.1?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:21 GMT-3