From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 07 2005 - 18:42:55 GMT-3
No arp frame relay also can cause issues with auto-install over frame.. I
have not run into any scenario which I have had use for it.
JL
>From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
>Reply-To: "Brian McGahan"
<bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
>To: <reo@chavallos.net>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
>Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:38:47 -0500
>
>Reo,
>
> If you enter both "no arp frame-relay" and "no
frame-relay
>inverse-arp" what you are seeing is the behavior of the "no
frame-relay
>inverse-arp" command. What I would suggest is for you to go
through our
>technologies lab series, as there is in-depth coverage on exactly how
>Frame Relay Inverse-ARP performs in various circumstances. For more
>information see http://www.internetworkexpert.com/ietl-rs.htm.
>
>
>HTH,
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
>Of
> > reo@chavallos.net
> > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 3:23 PM
> > To: Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> >
> > both commands together, not one or another.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian McGahan"
<bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > To: <reo@chavallos.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:43 PM
> > Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> >
> >
> > > Reo,
> > >
> > > I suggest you test them again :)
> > >
> > > R1#show run int s0/0
> > > Building configuration...
> > >
> > > Current configuration : 105 bytes
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0
> > > ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > > end
> > >
> > > R1#show frame-relay map
> > > Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.2 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), dynamic,
> > > ^^^^^^^
> > > broadcast,, status defined, active
> > > R1#
> > > Rack2AS>2
> > > [Resuming connection 2 to r2 ... ]
> > >
> > > R2#show run int s0/0
> > > Building configuration...
> > >
> > > Current configuration : 105 bytes
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0
> > > ip address 10.0.0.2 255.0.0.0
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > > end
> > >
> > > R2#show frame-relay map
> > > Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.1 dlci 201(0xC9,0x3090), dynamic,
> > > ^^^^^^^
> > > broadcast,, status defined, active
> > >
> > > What does the above output indicate?
> > >
> > >
> > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > >
> > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 1:16 PM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > >
> > > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > > > no arp frame-relay
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I used (tested) these two commands to disable
frame-relay
>arp.
> > > > Second command is not used in CCIE R&S Practical
Labs solutions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > CCIE Lab is not about commands it's about solutions, the
same task
>can
> > > be
> > > > completed differently and as long as the results meet
task
>requirement
> > > you
> > > > get the points.
> > > >
> > > > -R
> > > > CCIE #12994
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Brian McGahan"
<bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:59 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > The example can be frame-relay arp - they
expect one command,
>you
> > > can
> > > > > use
> > > > > > two...
> > > > >
> > > > > Which command are you referring to? Have you
tested this? :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > > > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > > > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > > > > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > > Behalf
> > > > > Of
> > > > > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:52 PM
> > > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Extra command which does not break the
solution would not take
> > > points
> > > > > > away.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The example can be frame-relay arp - they
expect one command,
>you
> > > can
> > > > > use
> > > > > > two...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -R
> > > > > > CCIE #12944
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Brian Dennis"
<bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:50 AM
> > > > > > Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Neither needs to be adjusted. It's our
goal in the workbook
>to
> > > not
> > > > > only
> > > > > > > help you pass the lab but learn the
technologies. This is
>one
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > scenarios that do both. If you put the
extra command in
>your
> > > > > > > configuration they are not going to take
points away from
>you on
> > > the
> > > > > > > lab.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210
(R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > > > > > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > > > > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and
Canada)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
>On
> > > Behalf
> > > > > Of
> > > > > > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:26 PM
> > > > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nice to know about MQC queue calculation.
Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Unfortunately, the solution for the task
is more that the
>task
> > > > > require
> > > > > > > (with
> > > > > > > is ok for real lab).
> > > > > > > Task does not ask to do anything with the
queue.
> > > > > > > Either solution or task wording need to
adjusted.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Brian Dennis"
<bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > > > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>
> > > > > > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:11 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You could safely assume that it's a
question with a hidden
> > > answer
> > > > > ;-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As far as "why", read the
caution note for the solution.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210
(R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > > > > > > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > > > > > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US
and Canada)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 17:55 -0800,
reo@chavallos.net
>wrote:
> > > > > > > > > is this a question with hidden
answer?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > or you actually asking for task
wording?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > From: "Brian McGahan"
<bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > > > > > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06,
2005 5:16 PM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task
9.10
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What does the task ask
for?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > > > > > > > >
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > > > > > >
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > > > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x
705
> > > > > > > > > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x
705
> > > > > > > > > > 24/7 Support:
http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > > > > > Live Chat:
http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -----Original
Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > From:
nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> > > > > On
> > > > > > > Behalf
> > > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday,
January 06, 2005 6:27 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > To:
ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: IEWB Lab 2
Task 9.10
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm at the stage when
I'm trying to understand every
> > > little
> > > > > > > detail...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Why task gives line
speed (512kbps)?
> > > > > > > > > > > Why the solution has
"bandwidth 512" under the
> > > interface?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -R
> > > > > > > > > > > #12944
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Subscription
information may be found at:
> > > > > > > > > > >
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Subscription information
may be found at:
> > > > > > > > > >
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Subscription information may be
found at:
> > > > > > > > >
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Subscription information may be
found at:
> > > > > > > >
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > > >
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:20 GMT-3