From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Jan 07 2005 - 18:38:47 GMT-3
Reo,
If you enter both "no arp frame-relay" and "no frame-relay
inverse-arp" what you are seeing is the behavior of the "no frame-relay
inverse-arp" command. What I would suggest is for you to go through our
technologies lab series, as there is in-depth coverage on exactly how
Frame Relay Inverse-ARP performs in various circumstances. For more
information see http://www.internetworkexpert.com/ietl-rs.htm.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> reo@chavallos.net
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 3:23 PM
> To: Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
>
> both commands together, not one or another.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> To: <reo@chavallos.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:43 PM
> Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
>
>
> > Reo,
> >
> > I suggest you test them again :)
> >
> > R1#show run int s0/0
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration : 105 bytes
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no arp frame-relay
> > end
> >
> > R1#show frame-relay map
> > Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.2 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), dynamic,
> > ^^^^^^^
> > broadcast,, status defined, active
> > R1#
> > Rack2AS>2
> > [Resuming connection 2 to r2 ... ]
> >
> > R2#show run int s0/0
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration : 105 bytes
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > ip address 10.0.0.2 255.0.0.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no arp frame-relay
> > end
> >
> > R2#show frame-relay map
> > Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.1 dlci 201(0xC9,0x3090), dynamic,
> > ^^^^^^^
> > broadcast,, status defined, active
> >
> > What does the above output indicate?
> >
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 1:16 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > >
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > >
> > > Yes, I used (tested) these two commands to disable frame-relay
arp.
> > > Second command is not used in CCIE R&S Practical Labs solutions.
> > >
> > >
> > > CCIE Lab is not about commands it's about solutions, the same task
can
> > be
> > > completed differently and as long as the results meet task
requirement
> > you
> > > get the points.
> > >
> > > -R
> > > CCIE #12994
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:59 AM
> > > Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > >
> > >
> > > > > The example can be frame-relay arp - they expect one command,
you
> > can
> > > > use
> > > > > two...
> > > >
> > > > Which command are you referring to? Have you tested this? :)
> > > >
> > > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > > >
> > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > > > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > > > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf
> > > > Of
> > > > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:52 PM
> > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > >
> > > > > Extra command which does not break the solution would not take
> > points
> > > > > away.
> > > > >
> > > > > The example can be frame-relay arp - they expect one command,
you
> > can
> > > > use
> > > > > two...
> > > > >
> > > > > -R
> > > > > CCIE #12944
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:50 AM
> > > > > Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Neither needs to be adjusted. It's our goal in the workbook
to
> > not
> > > > only
> > > > > > help you pass the lab but learn the technologies. This is
one
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > scenarios that do both. If you put the extra command in
your
> > > > > > configuration they are not going to take points away from
you on
> > the
> > > > > > lab.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > > > > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > > > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
On
> > Behalf
> > > > Of
> > > > > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:26 PM
> > > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nice to know about MQC queue calculation. Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately, the solution for the task is more that the
task
> > > > require
> > > > > > (with
> > > > > > is ok for real lab).
> > > > > > Task does not ask to do anything with the queue.
> > > > > > Either solution or task wording need to adjusted.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>
> > > > > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:11 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You could safely assume that it's a question with a hidden
> > answer
> > > > ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As far as "why", read the caution note for the solution.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > > > > > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > > > > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 17:55 -0800, reo@chavallos.net
wrote:
> > > > > > > > is this a question with hidden answer?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > or you actually asking for task wording?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > > > > > To: <reo@chavallos.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 5:16 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: RE: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What does the task ask for?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > > > > > > > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > > > > > > > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > > > > > > > > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > > > > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> > > > On
> > > > > > Behalf
> > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > reo@chavallos.net
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:27 PM
> > > > > > > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm at the stage when I'm trying to understand every
> > little
> > > > > > detail...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Why task gives line speed (512kbps)?
> > > > > > > > > > Why the solution has "bandwidth 512" under the
> > interface?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -R
> > > > > > > > > > #12944
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:20 GMT-3