From: Mike Louis (louism@gcs.k12.nc.us)
Date: Wed Jan 05 2005 - 23:16:42 GMT-3
I believe that most performance measures for Cisco equipment are
assuming a 64byte packet size. so divide 1.7Gbps/64byte*8 and you get
3,320,312 pps or 3.3 million PPS of cleartext throughput or worse if you
enable encryption.
Mike Louis CCNP,CCDA
Network Engineer
Granville County Schools Technology Team
919-693-4613 (office)
919-693-3791(fax)
919-691-0682(mobile)
>>> "Conte, Charles" <Charles.Conte@nasdaq.com> 01/05/05 5:22 PM >>>
It doesn't work like that in actual practice. Thanks anyways.
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil [mailto:theccie@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 5:04 PM
To: Conte, Charles
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OT:Anybody know the PPS for PIX535
Just divide the Gbps or Mbps by the packet size you want (with or
without header).
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:56:00 -0500, Conte, Charles
<Charles.Conte@nasdaq.com> wrote:
> No where do I see PPS. :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil [mailto:theccie@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 4:52 PM
> To: Conte, Charles
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OT:Anybody know the PPS for PIX535
>
> Scrow down to Performance Summary:
>
> Performance Summary
>
> Cleartext throughput: Up to 1.7 Gbps
> Concurrent connections: 500,000
> 168-bit 3DES IPSec VPN throughput: Up to 425 Mbps with VAC+ or 100
Mbps
> with VAC
> 128-bit AES IPSec VPN throughput: Up to 495 Mbps with VAC+
> 256-bit AES IPSec VPN throughput: Up to 425 Mbps with VAC+
> Simultaneous VPN tunnels: 2000
>
> Phil
>
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:37:14 -0500, Conte, Charles
> <Charles.Conte@nasdaq.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anybody have any information on what the PIX535 can
> > handle for PPS?
> >
> > I did check the following link, but I couldn't find the
> > information. I may be missing it.
> >
> >
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_shee
> > t09186a008007d05d.html
> >
> > Charles
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:19 GMT-3