Re: Face-Off - Dolye vs Deal on NAT

From: Sameh El Tawil (eltawil@free.fr)
Date: Sun Dec 05 2004 - 13:05:03 GMT-3


Tim,
The static translation with a route-map is a new feature in 12.2(4)T. This
was released sometime in mid 2004 and did not exist when Doyle released his
book. Before that route-maps were only allowed with dynamic translations.

HTH,
Sameh

----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: Face-Off - Dolye vs Deal on NAT

> Hi guys,
>
> In the book, Cisco Router Firewall Security, by Richard Deal on page 520
he
> has an example of static translation
>
> which almost exactly the same as the example in Doyle's Routing TCP/IP v
II on
> page 378.
>
> The only difference is that Deal uses a route-map in the static
translation,
> Dolye does not.
>
> My question is whether the route-map is REQUIRED in Deal's example or is
it
> just to show that's it's possible to use a route-map.
>
> Given Dolye's example of the same scenario, it seems to me that the
route-map
> is NOT required, but I want to make sure I'm not missing something.
>
> TIA, Tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 10:31:24 GMT-3