Re: Policing syntax

From: Joseph D. Phillips (josephdphillips@fastmail.us)
Date: Sat Dec 04 2004 - 23:47:41 GMT-3

• Next message: David Duncon: "Redistribution going wrong :("
• Previous message: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: Policing syntax"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph D. Phillips: "Policing syntax"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

OK, that does make sense. Thank you.

gladston@br.ibm.com wrote:

>Let me try.
>
>The best explanation I have heard so far is comparing it with WRED.
>
>Without exceed, any traffic above 'conform' is dropped (if this is the action specified). Exceed gives a chance of short burst to go through. If the burst persists, they exceed and are dropped.
>
>Good Luck on more feedback.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: David Duncon: "Redistribution going wrong :("
• Previous message: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: Policing syntax"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph D. Phillips: "Policing syntax"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 10:31:24 GMT-3