From: Phil (theccie@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 02 2004 - 15:52:21 GMT-3
That is a good question. Without trying in the lab I would say that if
your nat command is:
ip nat inside source list 1 pool SMALL overload
It will use PAT on the NATed source addresses, but every source will
be 204.1.1.3 with different port numbers. Without the "overload"
keyword my guess is that it will not work after the last address in
the pool is used.
Phil
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:34:59 -0500, ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've seen several examples where the pool of addresses (Inside Global) is
> smaller than the number of Inside Local that might potentially need to be
> translated.
>
> For example, let's say the inside local address is 10.0.1.0/24 which is 254
> potential addresses to be translated.
>
> Also, assume the pool of Inside Global address is define like this:
>
> ip nat pool SMALL 204.1.1.3 204.1.1.31 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> which is a total of 28 addresses.
>
> What happens when the 29th Inside Local address needs to be tranlated?
>
> Does it just not work or does NAT "know" to now use extended translation
> tables?
>
> TIA, Tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 10:31:23 GMT-3