Re: S-G RP-bit

From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Nov 30 2004 - 21:51:15 GMT-3

• Next message: generalccie@yahoo.com: "opinion on CCIE Security bootcamp"
• Previous message: Michael Wong: "opinion on CCIE Security bootcamp"
• Maybe in reply to: gladston@br.ibm.com: "S-G RP-bit"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Well, in my understanding Williamson isn't really saying that. the (S,G)RP-bit entry is a means of pruning an output interface without modifying the parent (*,G) entry. This mechanism does not affect whether the router in question receives the multicast via RP or SPT.

> The result on the book is that router C receives the traffic through RP
> because of the (S,G)RP-bit entry.

• Next message: generalccie@yahoo.com: "opinion on CCIE Security bootcamp"
• Previous message: Michael Wong: "opinion on CCIE Security bootcamp"
• Maybe in reply to: gladston@br.ibm.com: "S-G RP-bit"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:51 GMT-3