From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Thu Nov 25 2004 - 11:00:44 GMT-3
Show queueing interface helped, but there are a few problems:
If using just fragmentation (300 bytes), all packet normal Dual Fifo Queue
If using fragmentation and LLQ selecting all packets, the results are inconsistent; or maybe my interpretation :).
I was expecting that all frames, even the fragments, went to the High Dual Fifo queue. But giving it a second though maybe this test is inconsistent, because we would not want packets matched by LLQ to be fragmented. Any Coments?
This is the result without LLQ, just fragmentation:
r3#sh queueing int ser 0
Interface Serial0 queueing strategy: priority
Output queue utilization (queue/count)
high/1 medium/0 normal/511 low/0
r3#
r3#
r3#sh queueing int ser 0
Interface Serial0 queueing strategy: priority
Output queue utilization (queue/count)
high/1 medium/0 normal/665 low/0
r3#
r3#sh frame-relay fragment
interface dlci frag-type frag-size in-frag out-frag dropped-fr
ag
Serial0.34 304 end-to-end 300 0 1421 0
r3#
r3#sh frame-relay fragment
interface dlci frag-type frag-size in-frag out-frag dropped-fr
ag
Serial0.34 304 end-to-end 300 0 1660 0
r3#
Just is the result with LLQ (selecting all frames) and Fragmentation:
r3#sh queueing int ser 0
Interface Serial0 queueing strategy: priority
Output queue utilization (queue/count)
high/83 medium/0 normal/2900 low/0
r3#
r3#
r3#sh queueing int ser 0
Interface Serial0 queueing strategy: priority
Output queue utilization (queue/count)
high/85 medium/0 normal/3031 low/0
r3#
r3#sh queueing int ser 0
Interface Serial0 queueing strategy: priority
Output queue utilization (queue/count)
high/90 medium/0 normal/3156 low/0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:50 GMT-3