From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Thu Nov 18 2004 - 10:13:52 GMT-3
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> > Ivan Ostre9
>> >> Sent: woensdag 17 november 2004 13:17
>> >> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >> Subject: RIPv1 - yes or no
>> >>
>> >> Hello GS,
>> >>
>> >> I just have seen on
>> >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/ccie/rs/lab_exam_blueprint.html
>> > that
>> >> RIPv1 is NOT in the Lab blueprint. Can someone confirm for sure that
>> >> RIPv1
>> >> is/is not on the lab?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Ivan
>> >>
>> >> P.S: If it's not, I'll miss those FSLM/VSLM shit... :-)
> > >>
I think something very fundamental is being missed here. There are
no capabilities of RIPv1 that are not optional capabilities of RIPv2.
If one studies RIPv2 throroughly, there is nothing additional to
learn about RIPv1.
Classless versus classful? It's perfectly valid that a given lab
secenario for RIPv2 or EIGRP might tell you not to include no
auto-summary.
If you don't enable no auto-summary, multicasts, authentication,
demand circuit extensions, and anything I've missed in RIPv2, you are
functionally equivalent to RIPv1. The RIP PDU is the same length, but
just won't have some fields filled in. Both RIPv1 and RIPv2 run over
UDP port 520.
Understanding how to deal with a legacy classful network, be it
RIPv1, IGRP, or even badly configured BGP is a valid real-world skill.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:47 GMT-3