From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Wed Nov 17 2004 - 21:21:57 GMT-3
i'll have to disagree with joe on part of this........yes, it is off of the
exam, but i think it is worth understanding how it works and all of it's
'flaws'. i think you gain a better understanding of true routing by using
ripv1 than with ripv2 because of the problems associated with, or the lack
thereof, vlsm's....
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph D. Phillips" <josephdphillips@fastmail.us>
To: "Tom Lijnse" <Tom.Lijnse@globalknowledge.nl>; "Ivan Ostre9"
<ivan.ostres@snt.hr>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:43 AM
Subject: Re: RIPv1 - yes or no
> RIPv1 was taken off the lab over a year ago. This is not a violation of
> the
> NDA. I've taken it four times and the proctor specifically states before
> you
> take the exam that there's no RIPv1. Don't worry about it. Don't study it.
> Let it die.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Lijnse" <Tom.Lijnse@globalknowledge.nl>
> To: "Ivan Ostre9" <ivan.ostres@snt.hr>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:07 AM
> Subject: RE: RIPv1 - yes or no
>
>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> I think nobody except Cisco could confirm something like that. It is not
> on the blueprint, but it is also not specifically excluded (like for
> instance Token Ring and IGRP). Therefore it is in a grey area where it
> would
> be fair game on the lab, though Cisco probably does not consider it a core
> topic, since it's not in the blueprint.
>>
>> The only way to way to really confirm that it is or is not on the lab
> would be by people breaking the NDA to tell you if they had it on their
> specific lab or not. And even then it could always be introduced or left
> out
> of future labs at Cisco's will, since it is not on the list of excluded
> topics and is configurable on the equipment.
>>
>> On the other hand, I personally feel that anybody who is comfortable with
> IP (VLSM, subnetting, summarization) and the IP Routing protocols at the
> CCIE level should have the skills to deal with RIPv1. Just practice with
> it
> for a bit to get a feel for typical peculiarities of a classfull protocol,
> but don't spend weeks on it.
>>
>> Of course this is just my personal interpretation of Cisco's published
> guidelines, so I'd definitely be interested to hear what other people
> think
> of this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tom Lijnse
>>
>> CCIE #11031
>> Global Knowledge Netherlands
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ivan Ostre9
>> Sent: woensdag 17 november 2004 13:17
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: RIPv1 - yes or no
>>
>> Hello GS,
>>
>> I just have seen on
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/ccie/rs/lab_exam_blueprint.html
> that
>> RIPv1 is NOT in the Lab blueprint. Can someone confirm for sure that
>> RIPv1
>> is/is not on the lab?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan
>>
>> P.S: If it's not, I'll miss those FSLM/VSLM shit... :-)
>>
>> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a
> name of winmail.dat]
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:47 GMT-3