From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue Nov 16 2004 - 14:40:43 GMT-3
Jim,
If AD was not only local to the router, the routing protocols
would need some method to carry the AD in their updates. Just look at
the RFC's for the say OSPF or RIP and see if you can find any reference
to AD. This will answer your question.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:42 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: Distance command
Hi guys,
I just want to confirm my understanding of a detail with the use of the
above
command.
Is it true that no matter which form of the command is used or which
protocol
is running, it affects the AD of received routes only on the router on
which
it's configured?
I know, for example, with eigrp, if the distance command is used on
RTR-1, to
change the AD to 80, the eigrp routes learned from RTR-1 by RTR-2 will
show up
in RTR-2's route table with a AD of 90, not 80.
Is that logic always true with all routing protocols? And, is it always
true
that if the AD is changed on one router, that doesn't mean that the AD
needs
to or should be changed on the other routers running that routing
protocol?
TIA, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:46 GMT-3