stupid question BGP Next-hop-self

From: inlink (inlink@klsc.co.kr)
Date: Sat Nov 13 2004 - 03:15:57 GMT-3

• Next message: Sameh El Tawil: "Re: SSM resources"
• Previous message: Kian Wah Lai: "Re: Config mistake or version issue or bug - Who can prove the"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

 Hi, all
IF R3 know ebgp(bb1) next-hop-self via igp(rip),
does r2 need to next-hop-self for r3?

197.68.22.0---BB1--------R2----------R3
EBGP IBGP
1.
R3# sh ip bgp
*> i197.68.22.0 150.100.1.254(BB1) 0 100 0 254 253 i

R3#sh ip ro rip 150.100.1.0
R 150.100.1.0 [120/1] via R2, 00:00:26, Serial0/0(R2)

2. r2 next-hop-self
R3# sh ip bgp
*> i197.68.22.0 2.2.2.2(R2) 0 100 0 254 253 i

Which answer is more exactly ?

[IMAGE]

• Next message: Sameh El Tawil: "Re: SSM resources"
• Previous message: Kian Wah Lai: "Re: Config mistake or version issue or bug - Who can prove the"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:43 GMT-3