From: libone mhlanga (libone@lycos.com)
Date: Fri Nov 12 2004 - 19:36:48 GMT-3
hmmm I am not sure what answer to go for here so let me try and re-phrase the question again :-
a) I am in ASx and I have rtrA connected ASy and rtrB connected to ASz
b) I advertise the same prefix to both AS's
What will a router in ASyz (an AS thats connected to both ASy and ASz) that has "maximum-paths" configured do ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Dumoulin <Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE : BGP Gurus out there !!
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 21:54:23 -0000
>
> Also would not load sharing be a more appropriate term ?
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Peter Van Oene [mailto:petvan@gmail.com]
> Envoyi : Friday, November 12, 2004 10:20 PM
> @ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Objet : Re: BGP Gurus out there !!
>
> Doing so will create tremendous out of order packet delivery, assuming
> you split flows. I'd suggest that you really don't want to do this.
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:58:42 -0500, Brian McGahan
> <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> > > As well, wouldn't CEF be responsible for the per-packet balancing, not
> > BGP
> > > per se? I am not sure of that, but I would think that the switching
> > engine
> > > would be more in charge than the routing protocol.
> >
> > It's BGP job to install the route (or routes) in the routing
> > table. The actual load balancing is done through the switching process
> > such as CEF, fast switching, etc.
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jim Devane [mailto:jim@powerpulse.cc]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 2:53 PM
> > > To: Brian McGahan; 'libone mhlanga'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: BGP Gurus out there !!
> > >
> > > Hmm,
> > >
> > > But I believe the original question is to load-balance to two
> > different
> > > AS's... which is not possible right now. ( I can't have 701 and 1239
> > > hooked
> > > to my router and load balance to some AS they are both connected to )
> > >
> > > It would be great to have this in practice. But BGP is really set on
> > > making
> > > one single best choice for the route.
> > >
> > > As well, wouldn't CEF be responsible for the per-packet balancing, not
> > BGP
> > > per se? I am not sure of that, but I would think that the switching
> > engine
> > > would be more in charge than the routing protocol.
> > >
> > > My .02
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > Brian McGahan
> > > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 10:28 AM
> > > To: libone mhlanga; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: BGP Gurus out there !!
> > >
> > > Li,
> > >
> > > Yes you can do this. In order to do this issue the
> > > "maximum-paths" command under the BGP process. Note that the best
> > path
> > > selection must match for all the attributes up to the IGP metric.
> > >
> > > For more info see:
> > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/25.shtml
> > >
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > >
> > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > libone mhlanga
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 9:17 AM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: BGP Gurus out there !!
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible for BGP to do per-packet load-balancing to two
> > > different AS
> > > > numbers ? Put another way does BGP now have the ability to install
> > > two
> > > > routes in the routing table to the same prefix without preferring
> > one
> > > over
> > > > the other ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Li
> > > > --
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
> > > >
> > >
> > http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default
> > > .a
> > > > sp?SRC=lycos10
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
> necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
> confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to the
> intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and
> that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with the
> content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
>
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
> which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has taken every
> reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for
> any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry
> out your own virus checks before opening any attachments to this e-mail.
> **********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:42 GMT-3