Re: eigrp K values

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Nov 11 2004 - 23:39:59 GMT-3


See this link
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fiprrp_r/1rfeigrp.htm#wp1023638

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
To: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: eigrp K values

> opps.......make that k3= delay <?>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> MCSE, CCNP
> Office: 818-782-2061
> Cell: 818-430-8372
> jmatus@pacbell.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
> To: "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:25 PM
> Subject: eigrp K values
>
>
> > question about eigrp k values with regards to changing them - it seems
> > that
> > K1, K2, K3, K4, K5 do not directly translate to band, delay, rel, load,
> > and
> > mtu.... i believe that:
> > k1 = band
> > k2 = load
> > k3 = reliability
> > k4 = ?
> > k5 = ?
> >
> > is this correct? what do k 4 and k5 translate into? my references are
> > pretty
> > weak in a definitive answer
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John D. Matus
> > MCSE, CCNP
> > Office: 818-782-2061
> > Cell: 818-430-8372
> > jmatus@pacbell.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:42 GMT-3