From: Cisco Net (network.cisco@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 06 2004 - 22:25:49 GMT-3
Thank you Scott.
If i do "dlsw udp-disable" then UDP (2067) packets are out of question right...
So may be i should do this if i have to block these packets over
isdn.. I can configure to not to initiate these from the beginning
itself ... And the deal with TCP 2065 on the dialer-list to deny.
Cert.
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:49:40 -0500, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> Per RFC 2166 (latest), the answer is yes.
>
> Low IP tcp 11xxx to high IP port 2065. Either side udp port 0 to udp port
> 2067 for canureach type questions.
>
> FST is an IP protocol type, and therefore doesn't have a port number.
>
> HTH,
>
> Scott Morris, MCSE, CCDP, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
> #4713, JNCIP, CCNA-WAN Switching, CCSP, Cable Communications Specialist, IP
> Telephony Support Specialist, IP Telephony Design Specialist, CISSP
> CCSI #21903
> swm@emanon.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Cisco Net
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 6:42 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: dlsw port numbers fot tcp and fst encaps
>
> What are the port numbers used for DLSW in TCP and FST encapsulations.
> I know that TCP 2065 used for TCP but does it also have UDP explorer packets
> ?
>
> Please list out the TCP and FST port numbers incase i need to show those
> traffic as uninterested for ISDN.
> Thank you
> Cert.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:39 GMT-3