From: Cisco Net (network.cisco@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 23:42:02 GMT-3
This is an acceptable/required behavior as per the RFC (2328).
This is how ospf type point-to-multipoint help in hub and spoke
NBMA environment wher eyou dont have spoke to spoke mapping...
If you can ping between spokes&hub and spokes&spokes, move on...
Regards
Cert
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:21:00 -0800, Zubin Chagpar <ccie123@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying out different scenarios with frame-relay and OSPF. I have
> three routers, all physical interfaces with frame-relay map
> statements.
>
> When I use the default OSPF network type, non-broadcast - everything looks fine.
>
> When I convert it to point-to-multipoint, I get ospf routes for my
> peers on all three routers, /32s.
>
> This might be acceptable behavior and if it is, I missed something in
> my OSPF studying. Clarification would be appreciated. Thanks!
>
> R1 192.168.123.1
> show ip route
> O 192.168.123.2/32 [110/64]
> O 192.168.123.3/32 [110/64]
>
> R2 192.168.123.2
> show ip route
> O 192.168.123.1/32 [110/64]
> O 192.168.123.3/32 [110/64]
>
> R3 192.168.123.3
> show ip route
> O 192.168.123.1/32 [110/64]
> O 192.168.123.2/32 [110/64]
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:38 GMT-3