From: AK Singh (singh.anand@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 01 2004 - 19:15:55 GMT-3
Hello Kevin and Everyone,
In lab2 of CCIE Practicle book by cisco presss, it has two parallel
paths to an ethernet segment like below:
R1\
| \ R4
R6 /
R4 has parallel paths to R1 and R6 via FR. The solution doesn't
configure backup peer, cost or ethernet redundancy,? It counfigures
round robin load-balancing and dynamic peer though. Comments? when do
we need to configure ethernet redundancy..
regards
-AK
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:57:18 +0000, ccie <ccie@gannons.net> wrote:
> If both peers are availble (no backup peer/cost) then use the redundancy.
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
>
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I have a basic doubt about dlsw ethernet redundancy. I am trying to
> >understand when we need to configure it? What i understand after
> >reading the doc's its configured when one router has parallel
> >connection to atleast two routers who are on same segment and
> >SNA/NetBios is bridged between this router's attached segment and
> >other router's LAN segment.
> >
> >However, i have seen many configurations where we don't enable dlsw
> >ethernet redundancy. Some configurations i have seen which selects one
> >as backup peer or we configure a cost so one is preferred over other.
> >If i remember well i have some configs where its just left like that.
> >My question whether all these configs are valid? when do we need to
> >enable dlsw ethernet redundancy.
> >
> >Appreciate your comments. Thanks
> >
> >-AK
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:37 GMT-3