From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Oct 25 2004 - 14:08:22 GMT-3
> disable
> the port if a BPDU (superior) is received through the specific
interface
Yes. However, the difference between them is that with BPDU guard, the
interface will go down if ANY bpdu is heard, whether it is superior or
inferior. If you have a question that goes out of the way to
specifically mention superior BPDUs, I would go with root guard.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> micsoniu@telus.net
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 12:03 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: bpduguard vs. guard root
>
> Hi,
>
> Briefly:
>
> - could I use the command "spanning-tree bpduguard enable" in order to
> achieve
> the same effect as if I would use "spanning-tree guard root" ? - i.e.
> disable
> the port if a BPDU (superior) is received through the specific
interface
> ...
>
> Assuming that I'm running PVST(+) and the command is configured at the
> interface level and not at the global level.
>
> Thank you
>
> Narcis
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:52 GMT-3