From: Lord, Chris (chris.lord@lorien.co.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 20 2004 - 11:00:10 GMT-3
hi imran,
With most protocols (IGRP, EIGRP, RIP and OSPF) if they are running on an interface, they will carry the connected subnets into another protocol automatically through redistribution. The exception is ISIS which does not do this so you need to do it yourself using redist conn.
hth,
chris
CCIE #13925
-----Original Message-----
From: high spirit [mailto:high_spirit007@yahoo.com]
Sent: 20 October 2004 14:36
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: About ' redistribute connected '
hi group ,
wish to clear my doubt about the use of '
redistribute connected route-map CONN ' used in the
routing protocol , though another routing protocol is
running on that network/interface . When i check the
solutions in some instances i see the use of
redistributed connected on the boundry router (router
connecting 2 routing domains ) ... but on some
instances i dont see use of ' redistribute connected
route-map CONN ' on the boundry router. why do we have
to use redistribute connected though routing protocol
is running on that interface ??? Is there any logic
about when to use redistribute connected and when not
too ??? Is it something to do with depending on the
routing protocol running on the interface ????
Hope i dont sound weird and silly ... any
help/comments on the queries will be appreciated
.....
thanx ,
imran .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:50 GMT-3