From: McNeace, Roger (RMcNeace@ciena.com)
Date: Mon Oct 18 2004 - 12:02:33 GMT-3
For me the main reason difference with VRRP and HSRP is that HSRP allows you to set milli-second timers for much faster failover and convergence times.
Standby 1 timers msec 200 msec 750
_________________________
Roger McNeace , CCIE #12777
Senior Network Engineer
rmcneace@ciena.com
410-694-5805
Ciena Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [ <mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:24 AM
To: Group Study; Ting Wang
Subject: Re: HSRP vs VRRP vs GLBP
Hi Taylor,
I think that may have been true when cisco originally added vrrp. But now, both vrrp and hsrp support Enhanced Object Tracking. See new features in
12.3 (new feature was introduced with 12.2 but documented in 12.3).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ting Wang" <wangting@huawei-3com.com>
To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:10 AM
Subject: 4p84: HSRP vs VRRP vs GLBP
Hi Tim,
I think the HSRP can support more features that VRRP don't.
One useful feature is to track the other interface, which VRRP don't
support.
Taylor
-----SJ<~T-<~-----
7"<~HK: nobody@groupstudy.com [ <mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com> mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] 4z1m
ccie2be
7"KMJ1<d: 2004Dj10TB16HU 4:37
JU<~HK: Group Study
VwLb: Fw: HSRP vs VRRP vs GLBP
Hi guys,
I know that HSRP is cisco proprietary but are either of the others, VRRP
or
GLBP, Standards based?
Also, from a functional point of view, I don't see any difference
between HSRP
and VRRP aside from the fact that VRRP isn't cisco proprietary. Is
there any
other difference between HSRP and VRRP in what they each accomplish?
Thanks, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:49 GMT-3