Re: Re: Loosing easy points in the LAB - ISDN

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Oct 17 2004 - 23:04:14 GMT-3

• Next message: dmycheung@kcrc.com: "will cisco "inject debugs" during lab test"
• Previous message: Matthew Seppeler: "RE: weird inverse-arp problem"
• Maybe in reply to: joshua lauer: "Re: Loosing easy points in the LAB - ISDN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Or, authentication. If R3 is configured to authenticate R5, the calling
router, then no other router can call R3.

----- Original Message -----
From: <trouse@cisco.com>
To: <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Loosing easy points in the LAB - ISDN

> Where is the call Screening....it says ONLY R5 should be allowed to call
R3. So that mean no other routers should be able to call R3. So it
requires some sort of caller ID/call screening...
>
> This is very easy to get mixed up with the following quote: "R5 should
call R3, but R3 should not call R5."

• Next message: dmycheung@kcrc.com: "will cisco "inject debugs" during lab test"
• Previous message: Matthew Seppeler: "RE: weird inverse-arp problem"
• Maybe in reply to: joshua lauer: "Re: Loosing easy points in the LAB - ISDN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:49 GMT-3