From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Oct 11 2004 - 10:10:20 GMT-3
RE : Auto-RP vs. static RPThanks, that's kinda what I thought Brian meant but
wasn't sure.
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Dumoulin
To: ccie2be ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 9:05 AM
Subject: RE : Auto-RP vs. static RP
Hi Tim, this is documented in the doc cd. See the second note here
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr_
c/ipcpt3/1cfmulti.htm#1001143
--Richard
CCIE #13891
-----Message d'origine-----
De : ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Envoyi : Monday, October 11, 2004 2:02 PM
@ : Brian McGahan; samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk; Craig Dorry; Peter Ding;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Objet : Re: Auto-RP vs. static RP
Hey Brian,
What do mean, "All you have to do is manually assign an RP that
can accept join messages for the 224.0.1.39 and 224.0.1.40 groups."?
Thanks, Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
To: <samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk>; "Craig Dorry" <chdorry@yahoo.com>; "Peter
Ding" <pding@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 8:42 PM
Subject: RE: Auto-RP vs. static RP
> Sam,
>
> You can still run auto-rp in a sparse-only network without using
> the listener command. All you have to do is manually assign an RP that
> can accept join messages for the 224.0.1.39 and 224.0.1.40 groups.
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk
> > Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 12:54 AM
> > To: 'Craig Dorry'; 'Peter Ding'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Auto-RP vs. static RP
> >
> > Another thing might be sparse mode Vs sparse-dense. If u are asked to
> > only use sparse mode, I guess you will have to use static RP instead
> of
> > auto RP where initial discovery will not depend on dense mode.
> >
> > Then again, u can use listener command and bypass the need for dense
> > mode.
> >
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Sam
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Craig Dorry
> > Sent: 10 October 2004 02:51
> > To: Peter Ding; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Auto-RP vs. static RP
> >
> > PD - As it has been mentioned before, it depends on a
> > number of things.
> >
> > The main difference between auto-rp and static RP is
> > where the configuration needs to be done to add a
> > multicast group (or scope of groups). So it all
> > depends on how much control you want to have as well
> > as the size of the network and how comfortable the
> > administrator is with pushing changes (ie ACL updates)
> > to the number of devices under management.
> >
> > I've seen auto-rp selected most typically for either
> > large networks or where the administrator wanted to
> > have full control over what groups were forwarded (ie
> > forcing users to "register" their multicast
> > application/group prior to the network supporting the
> > traffic.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > --- Peter Ding <pding@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Since both auto-rp and static rp can be used in PIM
> > > SM mode, what are the
> > > criterias that will lead me to use one over other?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > PD
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
**********************************************************************
Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with the
content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has taken every
reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for
any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry
out your own virus checks before opening any attachments to this e-mail.
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:46 GMT-3