From: Oliver Grenham (ogrenham@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Thu Oct 07 2004 - 04:26:59 GMT-3
Nikolai,
I would have to agree. Can anyone else add amything to this.
Ollie.
----- Original Message -----
From: "nikolai" <be@tweedlebee.net>
To: "Groupstudy Email (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 1:57 PM
Subject: Classifying Traffic on a Per-Port Per-VLAN Basis by Using Class
Maps
> I am a bit confused about the functionality & application of this QoS
> feature. Cisco says that "It is supported only on an ingress port
> configured as a trunk, or as a static-access port", but I can't understand
> how would an access port deal with the class with a "match vlan", if it is
> receiving only its own VLAN frames. I can, however, see that a trunk port
> would benefit from matching VLAN IDs and manipulating them as configured.
>
> Here is the example form Cisco's 3550 config guide:
> ***************************************************
> Switch(config)# class-map match-any dscp_class
> Switch(config-cmap)# match ip dscp 9
> Switch(config-cmap)# exit
>
> Switch(config)# class-map match-all vlan_class
> Switch(config-cmap)# match vlan 10 20-30 40
> Switch(config-cmap)# match class-map dscp_class
> Switch(config-cmap)# exit
>
> Switch(config)# policy-map policymap2
> Switch(config-pmap)# class vlan_class
> Switch(config-pmap-c)# police 80000 8000 exceed-action drop
> Switch(config-pmap-c)# exit
> Switch(config-pmap)# exit
>
> Switch(config)# interface gigabitethernet0/1
> Switch(config-if)# service-policy input policymap2
> **************************************************
> Thanks,
>
> Nikolai Tsankov
> niko@4ovek.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:44 GMT-3