Re: Please confirm (conf#927474a02c2334d9eacc836eaa8587d0)

From: Collin Clark (neteng.ccie@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 01 2004 - 16:14:53 GMT-3


On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:14:13 GMT, ccielab@groupstudy.com
<ccielab@groupstudy.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's CCIELab mailing list. Because the
> server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to
> authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
> spammer.
>
> PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
> YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
> By confirming this e-mail you certify that you understand the following:
>
> 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
>
> 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
>
> 3. All postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
> 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
> 5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
> 6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
> To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once
> confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
>
> Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
> ------ORIGINAL MESSAGE---------
>
> From neteng.ccie@gmail.com Fri Oct 1 19:14:08 2004
> Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194])
> by groupstudy.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i91JE8uh024800
> GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:14:08 GMT
> Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 73so3227098rnk
> for <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.38.92.61 with SMTP id p61mr2299719rnb;
> Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.38.125.24 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <502ed7da0410011213712d3788@mail.gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:13:47 -0500
> From: Collin Clark <neteng.ccie@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Collin Clark <neteng.ccie@gmail.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: pix static command(s)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> What is the functionality difference between these two commands? Is one
> suggested over the other (best practices)?
>
> static (inside,outside) 1.1.1.1 192.168.1.5
>
> static (inside,outside) tcp 1.1.1.1 www 192.168.1.5 www netmask
> 255.255.255.255



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:41 GMT-3