From: Narcis Micsoniu (micsoniu@telus.net)
Date: Fri Oct 01 2004 - 02:57:57 GMT-3
Thanks.
Could you please elaborate on the 2 1/2 levels of priority in MQC ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 12:12 PM
To: micsoniu@telus.net
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: CBWFQ vs CQ
MQC is the new way, PQ and CQ are the old way.
You can allmost do anything with MQC, all that CQ can do for sure.
You have only 2 1/2 levels of priority in MQC, and have 4 in PQ, so some
scenarios might still call for PQ.
On the lab context, do what you are more confortable with unless you are
asked for some particular way :-)
micsoniu@telus.net wrote:
> Din't see an answer to this question, and I wonder if there is a
> posting issue... For redundancy purposes, here I go again:
>
> The QoS mess in my head requires a clarification, and a smart advice
> would be appreciated:
>
>
>
> - Let's say that I have a task that requires only to assign a
> specific bandwidth percentage to various protocols "through" a
> specific interface. No mention about IN or OUT, never mind the type of
> queuing required.
>
> - The traffic pattern is not complicated enough to impose CQ
>
>
>
> This task can be accomplished using both CBWFQ and CQ.
>
>
>
> There are obvious differences between these two queuing techniques (i.e.
> dynamic vs. static/no adaptability to traffic conditions).
>
>
>
> I would be interested about some guidelines regarding which one should
> be chosen vs. the other one. (I assume that if VoIP is present, then
> the LLQ would be the winner and policy nesting would be involved )
>
>
>
> A QoS Guru is in great demand ..
>
>
>
> Much appreciated!
>
>
>
> Narcis
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:41 GMT-3