From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Sun Sep 26 2004 - 08:09:10 GMT-3
I would use what I guess is what they are looking for.
I have to fight real hard my will to "show" them that I know tricky ways
or smarter ways. Just plain old simple things, if they work, are the
best. KISS (Keep It Simple 'n Stupid).
Sometimes it is really hard to find what is that they are looking for
though. I've approached the proctor with 4 different options on some
topics! Is it that ? No... And this ? No... What about this ? No...
Could it be this ?? No... Arggg! Then this ? And finally the poker face! :-)
Some requirements do seem open for many options, but (my feeling is)
they are looking for one answer.
Chalermchai Hoonpongsimanont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider following question .. found many like this on practice labs ..
>
> =========================================================
> R1 -- RIP -- R2 -- OSPF -- R3
>
> Configure five loopback interfaces on R1. Give IP address of
> 192.168.x.0/24, where x=1,2,3,4,5. On R1, advertise all loopback into
> RIP domain. Make sure R2 has all five routes to these loopback
> addresses in routing table.
>
> On R2, redistribute RIP into OSPF. Make sure that R3 see only "odd"
> routes. Use minimum of configuration line on R2.
> =========================================================
>
> I understand that this kind of question has an objective to verify
> candidate's understanding of using access-list. The common answer to
> this question is to use access-list on R2. As expected, the lab answer
> use route-map, match ip address from access-list, and apply this
> route-map with redistribution command.
>
> However, using access-list won't use minimum configuration line on R2.
>
> What if I configured R1 to tag all routes I want R2 to redistribute to
> R3 (also use RIP version 2), then on R2, create a route-map to match
> only these tags. I will get the same result, with less configuration
> line.
>
> I heard that proctor use script to verify my configuration. As a
> script kiddy, I think their script will look for my access-list.
> Obviously, the script will not find any on R2.
>
> Will I get the point? If you have only five minutes left, and don't
> have a chance to ask the proctor anymore, which way you guys will use?
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:49 GMT-3