From: mani poopal (mani_ccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Sep 26 2004 - 00:08:46 GMT-3
--0-119507612-1096168126=:80945
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Annu,
I don't think we have a option to specify mask(wildcard) in the network statement for RIPv2, as for EIGRP(In EIGRP you can assign a wild card mask). Even with RIPv2 we are going to see the problem I explained. I am trying to understand and it is not a scenario question. In the lab exam, if they are not going to specify the version, it is better to use RIPv2 with no auto-summary option.
thanks
Mani
Annu Roopa <annu_roopa@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mani,
IF it is a scenario Q or trying to understand fine, it does not work as we see. What if we change the RIP to version 2 and give with mask just to solve a Q if not specified.
Annu
mani poopal wrote:
Carlos,
I think you cannot do filtering of these routes either with distribute-list or offset-list. If you do, event with redistribution you are not going to see these routes. By default first rip router sees these routes with a metric of one(1), so you cannot use metric(=cost in ospf) to look like 4. I think it is a default behavior and we have to go with it. Thanks for replying
Mani
Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
That was not what I was thinking of.
As the route is learnt by network, I don't think you can use offset list
to get rid of it. What I was thinking of is to offset its cost to look
"as if" it got redistributed with cost 4.
It all depends on what you want to do/what the requirements are...
mani poopal wrote:
> Hi Carloas,
>
> Good point, I nevert though of that. If I give offset list of 15 for
> that network. If we redistribute from eigrp to rip, will that network
> is still visible. I have to try in the lab.
> Thanks for the response.
>
> Mani
> Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
>
> This network is already in RIP w/o redistribution.
> AFAIK, there is no way of not letting RIP know directly about it, cause
> there is no network mask for the rip protocol.
> If what you want is for it to "behave as", then an offset list could
> help.
>
> mani poopal wrote:
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > Assume following configuration. R1 is running EIGRP, R2 running
> RIP and EIGRP and R3 running RIP.
> > R1 R2 R3
> >
> -------135.15.1.0/24---------------------------------135.15.3.0/24---------
> > EIGRP EIGRP&RIP RIP
> >
> > Redistribution is happening at R2.
> >
> > R2 configuration:
> > router rip
> > network 135.15.0.0
> > redistribute eigrp 100 metric 5
> >
> > router eigrp 100
> > network 135.15.3.0 0.0.0.255
> > redistribute rip metric 1000 1 250 100 1500
> >
> > Question: Even before redistribution 135.15.1.0 network apperas
> in the R3 routing table as a RIP route with a metric of one. After
> the redistribution, still the network apperas with metric of one not
> five(R3 thinks route as RIP learned route(same major network) and
> not redistributed eigrp route. How can we make this network appera
> as eigrp redistributed network(RIP metric 5). In the RIP process if
> we deny with distribute-list command this network will not visible
> even with redistribution. Any suggestion is appreciated.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Mani
> >
> >
> >
> > B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
> > (416)431 9929
> > MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
>
> B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
> (416)431 9929
> MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
-- Carlos G Mendioroz LW7 EQI ArgentinaB.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE (416)431 9929 MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:49 GMT-3