From: Zachary Hinz (z_hinz@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 23 2004 - 19:01:11 GMT-3
Everyone is saying that the interface will run in area 1. What version of
code did this change in? It used to be that the statements were read in
order. Most of us have Routing TCP/IP vol. 1. Check out pages 576 and 577.
Zac Hinz
CCIE 12419
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Anand Singh" <anandksi@cisco.com>
Reply-To: "Anand Singh" <anandksi@cisco.com>
To: <duncan5322@bellsouth.net>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: OSPF Question
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:03:33 -0700
More specific one's are prefered. So "network 172.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area
1" will win.
Thanks
-Anand
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of duncan5322@bellsouth.net
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:28 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OSPF Question
>
>
> Could someone help me with this?
> Let's say I have this config.
>
> ROUTER OSPF 10
> network 172.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
>
>
> and I add:
> network 172.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
>
> which area will 172.1.1.0 be advertised in? Will the more
> specific statement override the more general one even though
> it comes later in the config?
>
> Thanks
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:48 GMT-3