From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Sep 20 2004 - 12:39:15 GMT-3
Hi guys,
I came a cross this doc on the above topic:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note091
86a0080094430.shtml
I must admit I don't really fully understand it.
In both examples, in the policy roting route-map, the next-hop address is set
to a non-existent address. How can this be?
On a more practical level, how possible is something like this in the lab. I
know, of course, all supported IOS features are fair game, but I find it
difficult to imagine Cisco coming up with a scenario that recreates a NAT on a
stick requirement given that there aren't any hosts in the actual lab and
loopback interfaces don't look like they could substitute for the hosts shown
in the examples in this doc.
BTW, I don't want anyone to break the NDA, just looking for comments on the
feasibility of creating a similar NAT on a Stick scenario in the lab.
Thanks, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:46 GMT-3