From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Sun Sep 19 2004 - 09:15:21 GMT-3
You can not mark & test on the same interface, regardless of the marking
mechanism.
You have to mark in the incoming if, and use the marking in the outgoing
if (or farther down the network if the marking is carried with the
frame/packet).
gladston@br.ibm.com wrote:
> ========
> quoted
> Sure, use something like "set-prec-transmit" on your conform action.
> ========
>
> Thanks Scott.
>
> But is it possible to use this information on the some box, on the same output interface? In one box, out of an interface, using CAR to let traffic X goes with high priority.
>
> I am wondering if CAR would set precedence 5 and WFQ would use this to treat this traffic differently. For example, suppose your eth0 is connected to the ISP; you want use CAR to police a specific traffic and give it high priority. The rest of the traffic would have low priority.
>
> I dont think so because as I undertood it, CAR just send or drop, basically, it does not queue, so WFQ (or other queue treatment) can not help. But I am not 100% sure.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:46 GMT-3