From: Erlend Ringstad (erlend@ringstad.no)
Date: Fri Sep 17 2004 - 21:06:19 GMT-3
have you tried to include:
set interface outgoing0/0
in your route-map?
if you're still out of luck after that,
you should try to put the route-map
on your incoming interface of r5.
regards,
erlend
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of John Matus
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 12:18 AM
> To: Adam Asay; ccielab@groupstudy.com; Joseph D. Phillips
> Subject: Re: policy routing
>
> hmm.....yeah, my acl is not being matched....which is very
> odd indeed. i've tried a prefix list and an access-l and
> both don't get any hits, although the route is the routing
> table. UGG....my sub-mask looks good as well.
> dammit jim!
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> MCSE, CCNP
> Office: 818-782-2061
> Cell: 818-430-8372
> jmatus@pacbell.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Asay" <aasay@cerberian.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Joseph D. Phillips"
> <josephdphillips@fastmail.us>
> Cc: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: policy routing
>
>
> > If you are using fast switching you need to use:
> >
> > ip route-cache policy
> >
> > or you could just use cef. Check your acl and make sure
> the traffic is
> > being
> > matched.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> > On Friday 17 September 2004 3:57 pm, Joseph D. Phillips wrote:
> >> Policy routing doesn't work, as I understand it, if the
> packets aren't
> >> being process-switched, for whatever reason. The packets
> have to transit
> >> through the router and fast-switching has to be disabled.
> >>
> >> The other possibility is that the ACL may be
> misconfigured, so you're
> >> not getting any matches.
> >>
> >> Anyone else care to chime-in?
> >>
> >> John Matus wrote:
> >> > the reason i ask it that it is "not" working so i'm
> trying to figure
> >> > out the "why" of it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > John D. Matus
> >> > MCSE, CCNP
> >> > Office: 818-782-2061
> >> > Cell: 818-430-8372
> >> > jmatus@pacbell.net
> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph D. Phillips"
> >> > <josephdphillips@fastmail.us>
> >> > To: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
> >> > Cc: "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >> > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 2:39 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: policy routing
> >> >
> >> >> Sure, that would work.
> >> >>
> >> >> John Matus wrote:
> >> >>> can you policy route a next-hop address to reach a
> destination or is
> >> >>> that
> >> >>> beyond the scope of the tool?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ie..................
> >> >>>
> >> >>> r5----------------------r1--------------------------r6
> >> >>> --- -------
> >> >>> ------------------r2-------------------
> >> >>>
> >> >>> if you are trying to get to r6 from r5 and you want to
> go through r2
> >> >>> is can
> >> >>> you policy route it with
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ip local policy route-m r2
> >> >>> route-m r2 permit 10
> >> >>> match ip add pre 5
> >> >>> set ip next-hop r2
> >> >>>
> >> >>> prefix-l 5 permit 150.1.6.6
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> John D. Matus
> >> >>> MCSE, CCNP
> >> >>> Office: 818-782-2061
> >> >>> Cell: 818-430-8372
> >> >>> jmatus@pacbell.net
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> >> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:45 GMT-3