From: Joseph D. Phillips (josephdphillips@fastmail.us)
Date: Fri Sep 17 2004 - 18:57:17 GMT-3
Policy routing doesn't work, as I understand it, if the packets aren't
being process-switched, for whatever reason. The packets have to transit
through the router and fast-switching has to be disabled.
The other possibility is that the ACL may be misconfigured, so you're
not getting any matches.
Anyone else care to chime-in?
John Matus wrote:
> the reason i ask it that it is "not" working so i'm trying to figure
> out the "why" of it.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> MCSE, CCNP
> Office: 818-782-2061
> Cell: 818-430-8372
> jmatus@pacbell.net
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph D. Phillips"
> <josephdphillips@fastmail.us>
> To: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
> Cc: "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: policy routing
>
>
>> Sure, that would work.
>>
>> John Matus wrote:
>>
>>> can you policy route a next-hop address to reach a destination or is
>>> that
>>> beyond the scope of the tool?
>>>
>>> ie..................
>>>
>>> r5----------------------r1--------------------------r6
>>> --- -------
>>> ------------------r2-------------------
>>>
>>> if you are trying to get to r6 from r5 and you want to go through r2
>>> is can
>>> you policy route it with
>>>
>>> ip local policy route-m r2
>>> route-m r2 permit 10
>>> match ip add pre 5
>>> set ip next-hop r2
>>>
>>> prefix-l 5 permit 150.1.6.6
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> John D. Matus
>>> MCSE, CCNP
>>> Office: 818-782-2061
>>> Cell: 818-430-8372
>>> jmatus@pacbell.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:45 GMT-3