From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@netcogov.com)
Date: Wed Sep 15 2004 - 12:19:20 GMT-3
I don't believe MLPPP was available on that platform at the time. It
was a while ago. MLPPP would certainly be a better and more supported
choice these days.
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@netcogov.com <-note new address!
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Ginsburg [mailto:dginsburg@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:55 AM
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: James; jellyboy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: FR back-to-back (ipexpert elabs)
Why not multilink PPP?
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:49:48 -0500, Church, Chuck <cchurch@netcogov.com>
wrote:
> I actually did use back to back FR once, as I needed to fragment on a
> slow circuit to maintain decent VoIP quality. But it's pretty rare to
> have to do so.
>
> Chuck Church
> Lead Design Engineer
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
> 1210 N. Parker Rd.
> Greenville, SC 29609
> Home office: 864-335-9473
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@netcogov.com <-note new address!
> PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> James
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 6:29 PM
> To: jellyboy
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: FR back-to-back (ipexpert elabs)
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:13:55PM +0100, jellyboy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am working thru the elabs, namely #301, #302 at the moment. All is
> > fine with p-to-p and multipoint. However some sections ask for a
> > back-to-back frame relay connection. I understand the configs and
> > theory. My question is this scenerio a lab scenerio concocted by
> > devious <pardon> instructors or does it have a more real life
> > application (one that I do not know about). Would love an answer.
>
> I suppose the back to back frame is more or less of frame relay
without
> a real frame relay infrastructure?
>
> Clearly, not a real life need. Why deal with frame when you can just
> run HDLC or PPP accross straight circuit? :)
>
> -J
>
> --
> James Jun TowardEX
> Technologies, Inc.
> Technical Lead Network Design, Consulting, IT
> Outsourcing
> james@towardex.com Boston-based Colocation &
Bandwidth
> Services
> cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc:
> www.twdx.net
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:43 GMT-3