From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Sep 15 2004 - 12:08:29 GMT-3
> Using CBWQF you can use "match ip rtp..." and "match access-group name
> CONTROL"
> to select both, them "police-map xxxx", "class VOICE" and finally
> "priority yy".
If you do this with both types of traffic in the same class-map
make sure you change the class-map to be "match-any" as opposed to the
default "match-all". You can also have multiple classes within the same
policy that are in the LLQ. This method is used when you want X amount
of bandwidth as priority for class A, and Y amount of bandwidth for
priority for class B.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> gladston@br.ibm.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 8:01 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: ip rtp priority quickie..question
>
> ======
> quoted
> When using 'ip rtp priority <start range> <range> <bandwidth>' under
intf
> configuration, my guess is that it matches only the voice "payload"
> traffic
> within the range defined, but does not match the control tcp/1720
> traffic..
> Is this a correct assumption?
> ======
>
> Yes, that's right. You need (if you want) to priorize 1720 with
another
> feature.
>
> Previous post said it maybe be alright to let control without priority
> because it is TCP.
>
> Using CBWQF you can use "match ip rtp..." and "match access-group name
> CONTROL"
> to select both, them "police-map xxxx", "class VOICE" and finally
> "priority yy".
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:42 GMT-3