From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@netcogov.com)
Date: Wed Sep 15 2004 - 11:49:48 GMT-3
I actually did use back to back FR once, as I needed to fragment on a
slow circuit to maintain decent VoIP quality. But it's pretty rare to
have to do so.
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@netcogov.com <-note new address!
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
James
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 6:29 PM
To: jellyboy
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: FR back-to-back (ipexpert elabs)
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:13:55PM +0100, jellyboy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working thru the elabs, namely #301, #302 at the moment. All is
> fine with p-to-p and multipoint. However some sections ask for a
> back-to-back frame relay connection. I understand the configs and
> theory. My question is this scenerio a lab scenerio concocted by
> devious <pardon> instructors or does it have a more real life
> application (one that I do not know about). Would love an answer.
I suppose the back to back frame is more or less of frame relay without
a real frame relay infrastructure?
Clearly, not a real life need. Why deal with frame when you can just
run HDLC or PPP accross straight circuit? :)
-J
-- James Jun TowardEX Technologies, Inc. Technical Lead Network Design, Consulting, IT Outsourcing james@towardex.com Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth Services cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:42 GMT-3