From: jean.paul.baaklini@accenture.com
Date: Wed Sep 15 2004 - 05:29:21 GMT-3
That's what I thought too.
With the new way (MQC), you would match rtp in a class-map and use the
priority keyword in the policy-map to reserve bandwidth...
Anyone confirms?
Cheers,
JP
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
gladston@br.ibm.com
Sent: 14 September 2004 22:24
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: LLQ/CBWFQ w/ FRTS vs.
=========
quoted
it states that "ip rtp priority"
and LLQ/CBWFQ can be used together.
=========
As I undertand it, it is more like "ip rtp priority" would be an "old
style".
Hope you get more feedback to clarify it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:42 GMT-3