From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Mon Sep 13 2004 - 14:46:28 GMT-3
I though there was an error on example 12-90, that route-map SELECTIVE_DAMPENING permit 20 would select any route (because there is no match command). But when implementing it, the route 193.78.1.0 does not go to history state.
It seems that the behavior of route-map is different when dampening (comparing with filtering updates, where a "route-map X permit 20" without a match clause would allow any other updates)
Any advice?
atm#sh run
router bgp 7
no synchronization
bgp dampening route-map Dampening23
neighbor 172.16.101.1 remote-as 1
neighbor 172.16.102.2 remote-as 2
neighbor 172.16.106.6 remote-as 8
no auto-summary
!
access-list 23 permit 150.150.1.0 0.0.0.255
route-map Dampening23 permit 10
match ip address 23
set dampening 45 1000 2000 50
!
route-map Dampening23 permit 20
atm#sb
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 150.150.1.0/24 172.16.106.6 0 0 8 i
*> 172.16.220.0/24 172.16.101.1 0 1 3 i
*> 193.78.1.0 172.16.106.6 0 0 8 i
r6#conf t
r6(config-if)#int lo 21
r6(config-if)#sh
r6(config-if)#int lo 10
r6(config-if)#sh
r6#sib
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
Loopback10 193.78.1.1 YES NVRAM administratively down down
Loopback21 150.150.1.1 YES manual administratively down down
atm#sb
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
h 150.150.1.0/24 172.16.106.6 0 0 8 i
*> 172.16.220.0/24 172.16.101.1 0 1 3 i
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:42 GMT-3