From: Geert Nijs (geert.nijs@simac.be)
Date: Mon Sep 13 2004 - 13:11:00 GMT-3
Hello group,
I know we can assign bandwidth limitation via policy maps, but these methods always seem to classify complete protocols.
1) Is it also possible to shape/limit a session (based on TCP ports).
For example: i want to allocate every FTP session to a different client (different source ip) 1 Mb bandwidth dedicated.
No sessions: no allocations, default traffic gets 100%
1 session: FTP, server <-> client A -> 1 Mb reserved for FTP (say 10%), default traffic gets the rest (90%)
2 sessions: FTP, server <-> client A
FTP, server <-> client B -> 1 Mb reserved for each, default traffic gets 80%
2) if we use the "bandwidth" statement in a policy map, is this bandwidth allocated statically ??
Like suppose HTTP gets 40% bandwidth, de rest gets 60%. If there is no HTTP, will the rest then get 100% ??
Is something like this possible on a cisco router ??
Regards,
Geert
#####################################################################################
This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution,
or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this transmission in error please notify Simac immediately
and then delete this e-mail.
Simac has taken all reasonable precautions to avoid virusses in this email.
Simac does not accept liability for damage by virusses, for the correct and complete
transmission of the information, nor for any delay or interruption of the transmission,
nor for damages arising from the use of or reliance on the information.
All e-mail messages addressed to, received or sent by Simac or Simac employees
are deemed to be professional in nature. Accordingly, the sender or recipient of
these messages agrees that they may be read by other Simac employees than the official
recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related activities
and allow supervision thereof.
#####################################################################################
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:42 GMT-3