RE: RE : RE : RE : RE : Lab6 Cisco r&s Prac Labs ISDN wording

From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Thu Sep 09 2004 - 11:22:04 GMT-3


At 2:14 PM +0000 9/9/04, tycampbell@comcast.net wrote:
>Howard,
>
>I may have mis-read John's post. I took it as he meant that, if you
>want to post something about the Cisco Press Lab book, it should be
>posted on his forum and not here. I apologize for any
>misunderstanding....
>
>Ty

If that's what John meant, Ty, than you are right As I understand the
moderation policy. That policy has no problems with people/firms
referring to forums covering their own product, but doesn't encourage
the creation of new general forums.

The RE: RE:...etc. may have been too much for my aging eyes.

>
>.
>
>-------------- Original message --------------
>
>> At 11:31 AM +0000 9/9/04, tycampbell@comcast.net wrote:
>> >John,
>> >Just curious as to why the questions should be posted on your forum
>> >and not on this board for all of us to see ? Or do you mean in
>> >addition to this board ?
>> >No offense, but I find this board extremely helpful, and I don't
>> >want to join another forum at this time.
>> >Ty
>> >
>>
>> Ty, perhaps I am misreading you, but there has been a long, and
>> sometimes difficult, of study material vendors participating in the
>> Groupstudy list. The list owner directed the moderators to censor
>> blatant marketing, but the moderation team has never had a problem
>> with people discussing a scenario or problem mentioned in study
>> material, without including the associated study material.
>>
>> There is no incentive for the vendors, other than perhaps for an
>> occasional sample that pushes close to marketing, to post all their
>> material on Groupstudy. If a third party did so, that would be
>> considered a copyright and/or NDA violation just like posting actual
>> Cisco questions.
>>
>> It's certainly not uncommon for people to post links, rather than the
>> content, even of public domain materials. Hopefully, I have an
>> Internet-Draft on BGP convergece that should get its RFC number Real
>> Soon Now, but I'm going to post
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-06.txt
>> rather than post 40-odd pages here.
>>
>> Maybe I don't understand your objection.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>===============================================================================
>> "What Problem are you trying to solve?"
>> ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not
>> directly to me***
>>
>>********************************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:40 GMT-3