CBWFQ on a Frame link...

From: Mike Calhoon (mcalhoon27@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Sep 04 2004 - 21:45:38 GMT-3

Next message: Ty: "lanbase rack rentals!"
Previous message: joshua lauer: "Re: OT: bootcamps"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Daniel Ginsburg: "Re: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello group,

Just a general question.here's the scenario: You get a QoS question, not
necessarily traffic-shaping, that is to be applied to an interface that
happens to be a frame-relay interface. You configure the solution using
CBWFQ. The question does not mention anything about frame-relay or DLCI's,
etc. Is it okay for you to just apply to policy-map directly to the
interface, or should you always enable FRTS and put the policy-map inside a
frame-relay map-class? Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Mike

Next message: Ty: "lanbase rack rentals!"
Previous message: joshua lauer: "Re: OT: bootcamps"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Daniel Ginsburg: "Re: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CBWFQ on a Frame link..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:36 GMT-3