From: marc van hoof (mvh@marcvanhoof.com)
Date: Thu Sep 02 2004 - 23:10:01 GMT-3
True, but don't get too caught up on using a feature of the technology
that is specific to the "section" of the lab, or else you'll get caught
out sometimes.
eg. if the IGP section has a discontiguous OSPF area 0, and they forbid
you from using ospf virtual links, then it's important to know which
non-OSPF features can help solve your problem.
-marc.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
James
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:23 AM
To: Rohan Grover
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Prefix-list and access-list
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:37:06PM +0530, Rohan Grover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This has been on my mind for quite sometime.
>
> If a scenario explicitly forbids use of access-lists, can prefix-lists
be used?
Yup. I've seen a number of questions like that. Most of the solutions I
saw were done
using prefix-lists instead. But remember to watch the context of the
question at all
times. One of the keys to understand CCIE wording from Practice Labs
book is that when you
are asked to do
something, try to think of all solutions that are possible, then start
listing 1 thru 10
in terms of which method is most relevant to the current technology
topic the question
covers. For example, if you are asked to route 10.0.2.0/24 out to R2
instead of R1, and
the question is being asked in BGP, it is prudent to know that
redirecting the path via
IGP is not as good as manipulating BGP attributes to do so.
HTH,
-J
>
> Or do we need to think of some other solution?
>
> Thanks
> Rohan
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:35 GMT-3