RE : ripV2 unicast

From: Richard Dumoulin (Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr)
Date: Wed Sep 01 2004 - 04:15:07 GMT-3

• Next message: akbar khan: "RE: ODR issue"
• Previous message: Ccielab: "Re: Thank you!"
• Next in thread: James: "Re: RE : ripV2 unicast"
• Maybe reply: James: "Re: RE : ripV2 unicast"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

But if you re only asked to configure one side then there is little chance
the other end has a GRE tunnel already built,

--Richard

-----Message d'origine-----
De : James [mailto:james@towardex.com]
Envoyi : Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:25 PM
@ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
Objet : ripV2 unicast

Under RIPv2... when asked to perform unicast updates w/o using neigh +
passive,
you can do this by NAT'ing destination udp port 520 with dest. ip of
multicast
224.0.0.9 swapped to a unicast address.

Would other acceptable option be... using gre tunnel between two routers and
running rip over it? I woudl think its still unicast between the _routers_.

Thanks,
-J

--
James Jun                                            TowardEX Technologies,
Inc.
Technical Lead                        Network Design, Consulting, IT
Outsourcing
james@towardex.com                  Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth
Services
cell: 1(978)-394-2867           web: http://www.towardex.com , noc:
www.twdx.net

• Next message: akbar khan: "RE: ODR issue"
• Previous message: Ccielab: "Re: Thank you!"
• Next in thread: James: "Re: RE : ripV2 unicast"
• Maybe reply: James: "Re: RE : ripV2 unicast"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:34 GMT-3