Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4
From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Mon Aug 30 2004 - 10:51:11 GMT-3
- Next message: ccie2be: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Previous message: Wayne Lawson: "Re: #13832"
- Next in thread: ccie2be: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Task is to control P2P traffic after doing shaping to 5M
on an interface.
The solution proposed is to nest two service policies, one to do the
shaping and the other to do the policing.
But I think the policies are reversed.
The sol goes:
int atm0/0/0
service-policy SHAPE
policy-map SHAPE
class class-default
shape average 5000000 160000 80000
service-policy QOS_POLICY
policy-map QOS_POLICY
class P2P
police cir 8000
It is my understanding that the interface will shape to 5M ALL the
traffic and then the P2P traffic will be policed, so the link will be
underutilized (i.e. P2P will not be tx, but nothing else will take the
place).
Am I wrong ? (Would not be the first time :-)
--
Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
- Next message: ccie2be: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Previous message: Wayne Lawson: "Re: #13832"
- Next in thread: ccie2be: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Nested service policies, IEWB Lab 9, Task 8.4"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:50 GMT-3