From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Aug 18 2004 - 12:06:42 GMT-3
No. What does your EIGRP config look like? Most likely you
have the connected interface encompassed by a network statement under
the EIGRP process. Do you see it as D or D EX in the EIGRP domain?
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thunai [mailto:thunai@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:04 PM
> To: Brian McGahan; 'Annu Roopa'; 'ccie Meftahi'
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: ISIS & OSPF
>
> Thanks Brian , When I replaced OSPF with EIGRP , I got the routes with
> out redistributing. Is this a normal behavior.
>
>
> Regds
> Thunai
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McGahan [mailto:bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 2:55 AM
> To: thunai; Annu Roopa; ccie Meftahi
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: ISIS & OSPF
>
>
> Thunai,
>
> This is the normal behavior of IS-IS. The routing process
> treats IS-IS differently than the other IP based protocols. One of
the
> effects of this is that when you redistribute IS-IS into another
> protocol, only the routes that are listed as IS-IS in the routing
table
> are redistributed. This implies that connected interfaces (which are
> listed as connected) will not get redistributed. To resolve this,
> simply issue the redistribute connected statement.
>
> This used to be an issue with OSPF until they changed the code
> to have it include the connected interfaces. As of 12.2T however, the
> IS-IS code has not been updated to include this.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > thunai
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 9:44 AM
> > To: 'Annu Roopa'; 'ccie Meftahi'
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: ISIS & OSPF
> >
> > Thanks for the Input. The Questions My OSPF router should all the
> routes
> > with out doing a redistribute connected. Just to finish the other
part
>
> > of the LAB like BGP etc... i just did redistribute connected and
> > completed the LAB. I am not sure why that was not coming ... Any
case
> i
> > will simiulte only this enviormnet and test. again.
> >
> > Regds
> > Thunai
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Annu Roopa [mailto:annu_roopa@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 7:22 PM
> > To: thunai; 'ccie Meftahi'
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: ISIS & OSPF
> >
> >
> > Thunai,
> >
> > Have u given "redistribute connected subnets" and if u are using
> > route-maps for filtering any connected routes..verify them. Once u
> give
> > the command maybe just do a clear ip ospf redis and see if it works.
> It
> > should.
> >
> > HTH.
> > Annu.
> >
> > thunai <thunai@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hai
> > I my scenario , i have defined only IS-type Level2 I have done the
> > redistribution of Level2 routes in to OSPF.
> >
> >
> > Regds
> > Thunai
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ccie Meftahi [mailto:samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:42 AM
> > To: thunai
> > Subject: Re: ISIS & OSPF
> >
> >
> >
> > did u use redistribute level1 and level 2 ?
> >
> > thunai wrote:
> >
> > Dear Group ,
> >
> > I am working with ISIS & OSPF. The following is the
> > scenario.
> >
> >
> >
R1-(e0)----(isis)--------(e0)--r2(s0)---------OSPF(FR)--------s0(r3).
> >
> >
> >
> > R1 and R2 formed neighbors in ISIS , I have all the routes from r1
> > listed in r2 as ISIS routes. R2 and R3 formed neighbors in OSPF , I
> > have all the routes from R2 listed in R3 as OSPF routes
> >
> > I have redistributed OSPF and ISIS on R2. I have all the ospf Routes
> in
> > R1.
> >
> > However i have only the ethernet route ( where ISIS is running
between
>
> > R1 and R2 ) is missing in R3. I did redistribute Connected to get
that
>
> > route..
> >
> > Can some body help me on this.issue..
> >
> >
> >
> > Regds
> > Thunai
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:45 GMT-3