From: john matijevic (matijevi@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Aug 16 2004 - 13:30:18 GMT-3
Hello dipthish,
Im not sure what other workbooks are teaching you to make best use of
the topology, can you give an example? The author of the book is a CCIE
proctor, in other words he could be grading your exam, as there are
several proctors, if he would want you to put redundancy in the problem,
than he would have stated so. I really thought the lab was clear enough
in the instructions, but if its not, you can always ask the proctor.
Sincerely,
John Matijevic, CCIE #13254, MCSE, CNE, CCEA
Network Consultant
Hablo Espanol
305-321-6232
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-CCIE
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
diptish doshi
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 12:16 PM
To: john matijevic
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: CCIE R & S practice labs : LAB 4 ...
hi john/groupstudy ,
well i agree that just one virtual link will give
connectivity to area 0 ...But as far as my
understanding by default we are suppose to make the
best us of the topology and thats what i have learnt
in almost all workbooks ... soo if the topology
permits we should take care of the resilence of the
network.
Group guys ,do let me know if im suppose to think
in that much of depth or not ...
Regards ,
diptish .
--- john matijevic <matijevi@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hello Diptish,
> Although I haven't worked on this lab yet, I'm on
> lab 3 so getting
> there. I did take a look at it. And basically you
> only need 1 virtual
> link from R2 to R3, because ABR router R1 is
> connected to Area 11 and
> Area 0, ABR router R5 is connected to Area 0 and
> Area 22. ABR router R3
> is connected to Area 33, Area 22, and Area 1. So you
> only need 1 virtual
> link from R2 to R3. The question did not mention
> anything if the links
> from R2 to R3 were to fail. So that is why they
> don't have another
> virtual link from R3 to R5. Im not sure I see why
> you would want
> another virtual link from R3 to R1. So the book did
> not ask to provide
> redundancy, so that is why there is only one virtual
> link.
> Sincerely,
>
> John Matijevic, CCIE #13254, MCSE, CNE, CCEA
> Network Consultant
> Hablo Espanol
> 305-321-6232
> http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-CCIE
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> diptish doshi
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 11:00 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: CCIE R & S practice labs : LAB 4 ...
>
> hi everyone ,
> In the R&S practice lab book , lab 4 . I think
> apart from the one Virtual link between R3 and R2
> there should be 2 other virtual links from R3 to R5
> and R3 to R1 .
> To explain , in case the framerelay between r3
> and
> r2 fails the area 33 will get isolated .. but if we
> have R3-R5 Virtual link than there wont be any
> problem.
> And if Framerelay between R2 and R3 fails and also
> if Framerelay connection of R5 fails still we have
> connection through R3-R1 virtual link which wont
> isolate area 33.
> Am i thinking in right directions ??? do let me
> know .
>
>
> Regards ,
> diptish.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:44 GMT-3